Paul Oranje <[email protected]> writes: >> Op 20 jan. 2019, om 17:52 heeft Thomas Nixon <[email protected]> het volgende >> geschreven: >> >> I could add a new subtarget like xrx200 but with small_flash enabled, but >> this >> seems a bit excessive for a single board. The DM200 has generally been a pain >> to support, and there are better options out there, so I wonder if it makes >> more sense to just drop it. > > Some people use this modem, so dropping its support will not please everybody. > Supporting it as a small flash device seems the right approach.
I wonder about those better options... What are they? The reason I ask is that the DM200 was the only candidate I found when I recently looked for something suitable as a simple VDSL2 to ethernet bridge. There are a couple of other lantiq-based devices which could do, but they all include unwanted radios. Maybe not a big problem. But still. The DM200 seems unique enough for me to warrant extending the support, if possible. The hardware is of course not suitable for much except a DSL bridging modem, so missing support for more advanced features would not be a problem. Bjørn _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
