Hi Dmitry, I just sent a bunch of patches based on your initial patch.
Note that your patch is only stored as comment to another and lacks Signed-off, if I'm not mistaken. Will try to test all of this during the week. Best Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Dmitry Tunin > Sent: Montag, 25. Februar 2019 19:31 > To: Christian Lamparter <[email protected]> > Cc: Adrian Schmutzler <[email protected]>; Petr Štetiar > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: speed up ath9k-eeprom > extraction > > пн, 25 февр. 2019 г. в 21:20, Christian Lamparter <[email protected]>: > > > > The only problem here is that not all platforms need it. > > The problem I always have is more along the way that a patch should > > receive some "on-device" testing. So I do look forward for patches > > that received a "Tested-by:" tag or has positive replies from > > random/unlikely people. But we sadly all know that this system has its > limits. > > In this case mine is really tested on a device if that really matters in this > case;- > ) I don't think there can be any problems with this simple approach. > > Regarding "not all devices" I meant that that eeprom.sh when added to > global base-files, will be useless for many platforms. > I added DIR-825B1 to ath79 and it needed some hacks to get eeprom and > mac, there is no way to upstream this type of methods. But it is an old > device. > > But without these patches many devices have disabled wireless on first boot > after flashing, because caldata is not ready in time. Fixing this annoying > behavior is important. > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
pgpRTCGC0n09Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
