W dniu 16.05.2019 o 23:47, Marek Behun pisze: > On Thu, 16 May 2019 22:35:35 +0200 > Tomasz Maciej Nowak <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Marek, >> >> W dniu 16.05.2019 o 20:38, Marek Behún pisze: >>> Add support for kernel 4.19 to the mvebu target. >>> >>> This is the first version, unfortunately I only have Turris Omnia and >>> Turris Mox to test this on, and Turris Mox is not yet supported in these >>> patches. >> >> You beat me to it, but not only You >> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/1646. >> Only recently I had time to look at it and this: >> https://github.com/tmn505/openwrt/tree/mvebu-4.19 >> is my shot at it (based on initial Marko Ratkaj work). I asked Sébastien in >> mentioned PR on GitHub if I can send it here. >> >> Just yesterday and today I got report from owners of WRT1900AC and WRT32X >> that their >> NAND chips are working: >> https://forum.openwrt.org/t/kernel-4-19-upgrade-issue-on-mvebu-target-s/32966/32 >> https://forum.openwrt.org/t/kernel-4-19-upgrade-issue-on-mvebu-target-s/32966/34 >> So it seems that most difficult devices are working. Unfortunately I don't >> have >> anything with SFP, so would be nice to know if anything needs to be added. >> >>> >>> So if you guys could try this and give feedback. >> >> Most of the kept patches are similar and on ESPRESSObin everything seems to >> work OK. > > This is not only ESPRESSObin but also the 32 bit mvebu devices.
That's the only device I have, but reports of WRT series owners are promising. > > Ok, I will probably try to merge my changes with those in those pull > requests. Should I then open a github pull request? Or send a patch > series via email? Fine with me, send it here since that were You first sent it. I'll post update in relevant discussion threads on GitHub and forum. > > Marek > Regards -- TMN _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
