Hi all, some days ago I wrote this proposal[0] to split DEVICE_TITLE in DEVICE_VENDOR, DEVICE_MODEL and DEVICE_VARIANT (holding revisions and storage sizes if applicable).
I extended the image.mk to to use the newly introduced variables if DEVICE_TITLE is empty, meaning it can be used as a drop in. DEVICE_TITLE = $$(DEVICE_VENDOR) $$(DEVICE_MODEL)$$(if $$(value DEVICE_VARIANT), $$(DEVICE_VARIANT)) This simplifies and unifies the DEVICE_TITLE creation and introduces the possibility to search and sort devices based on vendor etc. A proof of concept is available here[1]. In future PRs I'd rework existing targets (not only ath79 as in [0]) and suggest developers adding new devices to use DEVICE_MODEL rather than the full DEVICE_TILE in their patches. I'd be happy to hear some comments! Best regards, Paul [0]: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/2124 [1]: https://sudhanshu16.github.io/openwrt-firmware-selector/ _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel