Can we not have a way of including unstable stuff in a way the consumers know it’s un stable ?
Like a 19.07 canary On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 20:22, Andreas Ziegler <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dmitry Tunin schrieb am 30.07.19 um 14:29: > > Are you taking in account that many devices added during the last year > > as ath79 won't be supported by a stable release. > > Master is no good now for normal use. That will mean that for the next > > year or so many users will require custom 19.07 builds. > > That doesn't sound very good. > > > > Initially ath79 was expected in 19.07, but it appeared that not all > > devices have been ported from ar71xx. So we are not ready to drop > > ar71xx, but we are ready to support ath79. > > to me, this is the only big negative thing here. > everyone was told, that new devices have to go into ath79 - and now we > will have a new release, lacking binaries for many many new devices > because new device support in ar71xx was not welcome. > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
