Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Michal Cieslakiewicz > Sent: Dienstag, 6. August 2019 16:06 > To: [email protected] > Cc: Adrian Schmutzler <[email protected]> > Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] ath79: add support for Netgear > WNR1000 v2 > > This patch adds ath79 support for Netgear WNR1000v2. > Router was previously supported by ar71xx target only. > Note: this is a 4_32 device with limited upgrade capabilities. >
...
> diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar7240_netgear_wnr1000-v2.dts
> b/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar7240_netgear_wnr1000-v2.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..a9eabb5a88
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar7240_netgear_wnr1000-v2.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
> +
> +#include "ar7240.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Netgear WNR1000 v2";
> + compatible = "netgear,wnr1000-v2", "qca,ar7240";
compatible before model ...
In general, it looks to me like you can exploit wnr612-v2.dtsi here.
LEDs will require some care, but almost everything else is shared.
In that context, one might think whether there is a better name for the shared
DTSI then ...
For the image Makefile, the same comments as in previous patch are relevant.
Best
Adrian
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
