On 25.09.19 17:14, supp...@maxnet.al wrote:
This is long distance, 5km with 4 dishes on each side. They are all vertical and all chains have signal range -60 to -65.

I don't have omni antennas. Is there a problem that i am using dishes?


I run dozens of long-range devices, and I'm seeing 2 issues in your setup:

1)

- Ack-to issues kick in starting from roughly 1000m.  When you cannot alter ack_to (coverage class), you will notice severe performance issues above 1000m

2)

- Using identical polarization on all chains is an absolute performance killer.

I have 2 devices,  both 2x2 802.11n, HT40 SGI, which are only 150m apart, all chains V polarized.

When running speedtests, inspecting ath9k rate control shows it is stuck at the max speed for 1 chain (iso 2)

In my case it means the absolute link rate is 130Mbit iso 270 in this configuration.

I can imagine using 4 chains will even reduce performance a lot more.

You should really try to use use H + V+ (-45) + (+45).

Also, ensure radio's at both sides have the chains on identical polarization. (Chain0 - V,  Chain1 - H, ..)


Regards,

Koen


On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 5:11 PM +0200, "Ben Greear" <gree...@candelatech.com <mailto:gree...@candelatech.com>> wrote:

    Is this short distance or long?

    Please try short distance with omni antenna first to make sure you are not 
hitting the delayed-ack issue
    or problems with your antenna.

    Change your antenna orientation so that they point in different directions.

    Thanks,
    Ben

    On 9/25/19 6:49 AM, supp...@maxnet.al wrote:
    > Hello,
> > Today i managed to connect the station wds at 80MHz channel. Signal is -56 and i have very low datarates. I have attached a photo. > >  When station was ddwrt and AP openwrt the datarates were 866/433. TX won't do more than VHT-NSS 1 although RX it's not good either because it's a 4 chain > radio and it should do VHT-NSS4. > > Thank you,
    > Klevis
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:36 PM +0200, "Ben Greear" > wrote: > > Weeks or months or whenever I have time, and maybe
    sooner if someone > wants to sponsor it. Please understand I, and
    probably everyone else working > on OpenWRT, am busy with lots of
    other projects and community work often > gets pushed to the back
    burner. > > Thanks, > Ben > > On 9/23/19 8:18 AM,
    supp...@maxnet.al wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > When do you think you
    might be able to make those changes to your driver? > > > >
    Thanks, > > Klevis. > > > > > > > > On 2019-09-20 13:00, Ben
    Greear wrote: > >> On 9/20/19 12:55 PM, Vincent Wiemann wrote: >
    >>> Hi Klevis, > >>> > >>> have you tried it with a short
    distance? > >>> If you did you should better ask Ben Greear
    directly. > >> > >> I asked him to post publicly so that others
    can help answer and that > >> my own answers might > >> help
    someone else. > >> > >> I have some patches that should enable
    coverage class settings for > >> wave-2, but I am too busy > >>
    with other things right now to port them to my ath10k-ct
    driver/firmware. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ben > >> > >>> > >>> By
    the way ath10k gen 2 chipsets don't work very well with long
    distance links without a > >>> special feature which
    implementation is only available to companies like Ubiquiti and
    very few > >>> people who have an own reverse-engineered
    implementation. > >>> It works on IPQ401X, QCA9886 and QCA9888
    based chips only. > >>> > >>> And it is not possible to set a
    coverage class for gen 2 devices, yet as far as I know due to
    missing > >>> documentation and implementation (correct me if that
    information is outdated). > >>> Furthermore a high channel width
    often results in problems > >>> due to lower receiver sensibility.
    > >>> We have better experiences with lower channel widths and
    sometimes get more throughput with that. > >>> > >>> Actually I
    think this does not explain your connection issues as 13 km is not
    that much. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Vincent Wiemann > >>>
    > >>> On 20.09.19 18:30, supp...@maxnet.al wrote: > >>>> Hello
    everyone, > >>>> > >>>> I am trying to setup a custom made outdoor
    link with Apu2d2 board devices and QCA9994 cards from compex.
    After i installed openwrt and ath10k ct driver, > >>>> kmod ath10k
    and board-2.bin the device can run a 80MHz channel in WDS AP. The
    problem is that it won't run as station or station wds. It can
    scan > >>>> the SSIDs but won't connect them. > >>>> > >>>> Any
    suggestion? > >>>> > >>>> Thank you! > >>>> Klevis > >>>> > >>> >
    >>> _______________________________________________ > >>>
    openwrt-devel mailing list > >>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >
    >>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > >>>
    > > > > > -- > Ben GreearCandela Technologies Inc
    http://www.candelatech.com > -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies
    Inc http://www.candelatech.com


_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to