On 10/28/2019 11:14 PM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
Ben Greear <[email protected]> [2019-10-28 14:42:32]:
Hi Ben,
found and fixed a bunch of issues
apart from lack of time, do you've any other good reason to not upstream those
changes? :-)
The original SO_BINDTODEVICE patches were offered upstream
and there is no interest. My recent changes would need
rebasing to clean them up before upstreaming, and I am not going
to spend any serious time on that since I'd still have to run
my own tree to get the SO_BINDTODEVICE patches and anything
else not accepted upstream.
Thanks,
Ben
and of course possibly added some new bugs.
As always, those could be probably spotted by another pair of eyes during
upstream review process.
Is there any interest in adding an iperf3-ct option to openwrt?
I can't speak for the rest, but from my point of view we don't need extra
package for that purpose.
* Support SO_BINDTODEVICE.
* Make sockets non-blocking to fix various ways the client and server can
hang.
* Server will recover from client doing bad things or dying unexpectedly.
* Fix socket leaks
* Allow compiling for win32 using mingw cross-compiler.
* Report summary stats in all cases on both client and server.
Those changes looks like a good upstream material.
-- ynezz
--
Ben Greear <[email protected]>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
