On 12/6/19 7:02 PM, Ben Greear wrote: > On 12/6/19 9:44 AM, Joe Ayers wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Possibly the same symptoms don't exist on 128MB RAM devices. >>> >>> Like there is some if condition, which is doing some nasty things on 64M >>> devices? I admit, that I don't have ath10k-ct source code under my >>> pillow, but >>> it doesn't make much sense to me. >>> >>>> Comparable results between above and my 64MB device. However, if the >>>> sleep time is extended the consumption is more >>> >>> Ok, I'll let it run overnight with 120s sleep in between. >>> >>>> I suspect this is not the intended behavior. >>> >>> No its not and it's even strange, that I'm not seeing it here if it >>> should >>> happen in the "default setup". Maybe its because: >>> >>> 1. You're using custom image (I'm using official prebuilt images) >>> 2. You're not providing all the steps needed to reproduce the issue >>> 3. I've way different hardware >>> >>> Every detail could make huge difference. >>> >>> -- ynezz >> >> On the device I am testing, it is both (2GHz) ath9k and (5GHz) ath10k. >> These look to be related patches to this issue: >> >> 960-0010-ath10k-limit-htt-rx-ring-size.patch >> 960-0011-ath10k-limit-pci-buffer-size.patch >> >> In the v19.07.0-rc2 build for the rb-nor-flash-16M-ac ar71xx image, >> these patches are applied to backports-4.19.85-1, but don't seem to be >> applied to ath10k-ct-2019-09-09-5e8cd86f. Should ath10k-ct have >> these and other patches? The device's installed packages do include >> ath10k-ct (from downloads.openwrt.org installed image). > > I think that if you need the patches for upstream ath10k, then you > should also apply > the patches to ath10k-ct. > > Platforms with more memory probably do not need or benefit from those > patches. > > Thanks, > Ben > Hi,
I am fine with adding these patches to ath10k-ct if they solve problems. It would be nice if a description could be added to the patches so I know what kind of buffers are reduced there. Will someone send a patch? Hauke
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel