Hello Bjørn, What an honor to talk to you! You are the author of the usbnet adapter kernel module! Thank you for replying to me.
With your suggestions, I tried to search documents from openwrt documents and found several: https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/wan/wwan/ltedongle https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/wan/multiwan/mwan3 https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/wan/wwan/start https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/wan/wwan/modemmanager And the last one from above is for about ModemManager. And I thought this would be something that I can use instead of the modem provider version of CM. But from the menuconfig, the ModemManager is not found at all. Maybe it's because of my OpenWRT is out-dated? I will try to find it from the latest openwrt. I am so glad that you are in this mail list. I want to share the information about my board, modem and openwrt version. But I am not sure if I can share it in public domain. Maybe it would be no problem but I will check it with my company first. Thank you and you have a good day! Jeonghum 2020년 4월 27일 (월) 오후 9:42, Bjørn Mork <[email protected]>님이 작성: > Jeonghum Joh <[email protected]> writes: > > > I am porting a 5G/LTE modem into OpenWRT. > > Follow the instructions for LTE modems. A 5G modem is pretty much the > same wrt drivers and basic management. At least for Qualcomm based > modems on a USB bus. Have no experience with anything else. The Intel > and Huawei modems are competely unknown to me, and most likely > unsupported for the forseeable future. And I'm also blank on the magic > of Qualcomms PCIe interface. Qualcomm did work on a driver, but it's > been a long time since I saw any update on that. I guess no one cares > enough. SuperSpeed USB is fine for most users for now. > > Anyway, several X55 based modems are already supported out of the box in > OpenWrt master. There is no need to reinvent the wheel if you are using > one of those. > > You may obviously decide to implement your own alternative solutions, > like using some vendor software. But that will limit the user community > severely. At least until the solution attracts more users. And > community support depends on users, which I believe is something you > should consider since you have ended up in this forum. You are unlikely > to find anyone here who have any experience with your particular vendor > software version. > > Personally, I am happy to give advice about anything regardless of > experience. But the quality of that advice is probably a tiny bit > better when it is based on something I've tried myself. Or maybe not? > Is probably bad in any case. > > > Bjørn >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
