I think that CONFIG_SKINNY is a good concept, but for all the reasons you cite:
Abuse Department <[email protected]> wrote: > Some of us work with more current machines that are also more capable, > realizing that eventually machines with 32MB of DRAM and 128MB of Flash > will “age out” through failure and scarcity. > By then we’ll have a new “normal” about what the minimum expectations > are, and the conversation will continue, but with different > parameters. > Understanding that the definition of a “skinny” machine isn’t today > what it was 5 years ago, and that it won’t be the same again in another > 5 years, I’d like to proposal a CONFIG_ symbol that denotes that a > platform is in a class of constrained architectures. it seems that SKINNY should be an integer of some kind, not a boolean. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
