Michael Jones <m...@meshplusplus.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:35 AM Petr Štetiar <yn...@true.cz> > wrote: > > > Michael Jones <m...@meshplusplus.com> [2020-05-15 02:39:52]: > > > > > What's wrong with monit is that it's documentation is gigantic > > > > Good documentation with a lot of examples is hardly a problem, its a bonus > > point for me. > > > > > I think you misunderstood. > > Monit has a massive feature surface. I'm not even going to > consider it, it goes far far beyond the level of capability > that's appropriate for my use case.
fwiw, I've been using monit for exactly the sort of "my processes are important, my code is not perfect, and things should get restarted" since before procd even had process restarting. It _just works_ and has been a major help. I'm sure procd could be expanded with some basic pieces, sure, but where does it end? monit works right now, and has been tested and used by a large cast. Sincerely, Karl Palsson
OpenPGP-digital-signature.html
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
