> From: "R. Diez" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Do not hard-code IS_TTY in script 
> scripts/feeds
> Date: 6 June 2020 at 13:44:11 BST
> To: Petr Štetiar <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
>> https://openwrt.org/submitting-patches#no_mime_no_links_no_compression_no_attachments_just_plain_text
> 
> Sometimes I use Thunderbird, and sometimes I use the Yahoo web interface. 
> Both have problems with e-mail formatting, as they tend to reflow text lines 
> and mess with quotations and blanks. Sending patches as plain text inside 
> e-mails is too much trouble for me.
> 
> I do not understand why Patchwork cannot automatically pick up a patch from 
> an e-mail attachment aptly named xxx.patch, and with an e-mail title that 
> starts with [PATCH].
> 
> Is it possible to add patches manually to Patchwork using its web interface? 
> If so, I would try that way.
> 
> Otherwise, I am tempted to drop it (and other such further contributions I 
> had in the pipeline). This is a trivial fix and the administrative cost of 
> getting it right is clearly disproportionate.

I recognise the frustration!  When I first started trying to send patches I had 
similar issues (white space wrapping/reflow etc)  The same issues are 
encountered when sending to many open source email patch lists including the 
Linux kernel.  I came very, very, very close to giving up with openwrt, before 
being introduced to ‘git send-email’.  I fought a little with configuring git 
send-email and got it working, before I then discovered 
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/HowToUseGitSendEmail/  
which is a quite helpful guide. Maybe that can help you too?

Kevin
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to