On 2020-07-30 11:15, [email protected] wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Bas Mevissen [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2020 10:54
To: Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Transform OpenWRT to a Yocto / openembedded layer (was: Re:
dm-verity support)
(...)
Isn't there some deferred or other state that better expresses the
actual
situation?
For me, "deferred" means essentially "we don't do it now, but we will
do it later".
However, there is no indication that the situation will be different
in a year or two. So I chose "rejected", as a waiting time of 8 months
without any response indicate that the feature is not wanted.
As Thomas stated himself, this surely is "unfortunate", but I'm just
putting into effect what's obvious here.
Yes, you probably did the best thing that can be done in this situation:
bring it to some kind of closure and inform the submitter of the reason.
With the latter being properly done, the actual working of the closure
is less relevant.
Regards,
Bas.
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
