Hi, > > define Package/wpa-supplicant-openssl $(call > > Package/wpa-supplicant/Default,$(1)) > > + TITLE+= (OpenSSL) > > shouldn't this rather be '(OpenSSL full)' as well then? > > > VARIANT:=supplicant-full-openssl > > DEPENDS+=+libopenssl > > endef > > > > define Package/wpa-supplicant-wolfssl $(call > > Package/wpa-supplicant/Default,$(1)) > > + TITLE+= (wolfSSL) > > shouldn't this rather be '(wolfSSL full)' as well then?
Indeed, good find, will change both cases above as suggested. > And what about the '(built-in full)' variant of wpa_supplicant? Err, yes, to follow the current scheme I should add a "(full)" there as well. Would you prefer to use "(built-in full)" instead of plain "(full)" in all non-SSL cases? This might actually be more helpful to differentiate. Thanks Adrian
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
