On 04/12/2020 13:25, Andre Heider wrote:
Hi,
On 04/12/2020 13:03, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Hi,
is there any reason not to use the flock style below? It should be more
reliable wrt. unlocking if the script is prematurely terminated.
I guess because it gets more difficult to fish out the answer for each
command then (I didn't check if it's guaranteed to be one line for each)?
But with `trap` I introduced it should be just as reliable I think?
In the end the script is still a mess... The two cleanups I did were
just the low hanging fruit.
The proper performance fix would be to move 'lucistat' to ltq-vdsl-app
itself. But there's ltq-adsl-app too, so maybe that's not desired from a
maintenance point of view.
I misunderstood, that flock style shound indeed work. Updating patch...
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
