Hi again, Adrian, On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 12:36, Rui Salvaterra <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 12:22, Adrian Schmutzler <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Shouldn't it be in target/linux/x86 then? > > You tell me. :) My rationale was, this being a pending upstream patch > (it hasn't hit mainline because this is a stop-gap solution while > people are working on "real" LTO, at least for Clang), it made sense > to include in generic/pending-5.4, but I have no strong feelings > either way, so just let me know what works best for you.
I just noticed we already have a similar patch for ARM [1] in generic/hack-5.4, so I'm inclined to put the x86 patch in the same place. Thoughts? [1] https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=blob;f=target/linux/generic/hack-5.4/220-gc_sections.patch;h=22276d4399d2aa2afcd23e94c7e95d29a9beab54;hb=HEAD Thanks, Rui _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
