Adrian Schmutzler <[email protected]> [2021-02-13 15:49:17]: Hi,
> > Seem like I need to prepare v2 as although I now have wpad/iwinfo in the > > image, I'm still missing ath10 and ath9k wireless modules... > > Is this about initramfs or why does it have to be DEFAULT_PACKAGES here? why do you think, that initramfs should be treated differently then any other images? I for example find it weird, that one target has usable initramfs and other doesn't. Those images can be used for many use cases, not only for installation of OpenWrt, but also for debugging and/or testing etc. Those images simply avoids trashing of the underlying storage medium. FYI I'm currently preparing daily runtime testing[1] of snapshot/release-snapshot/latest-release on ipq40xx mvebu targets for the start (there is no mvebu test on 19.07.6 for now as it doesn't boot). So as of today, ipq40xx passes the current very basic test suite and mvebu doesn't, 19.07.6 can't be even booted... 1. https://gitlab.com/ynezz/openwrt-device-runtime-testing/-/pipelines/255704256/builds Cheers, Petr _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
