Feb 27, 2021 16:52:01 Piotr Dymacz <[email protected]>:
Hi,
> I'm wondering what would be the most acceptable way to handle this?
> Is splitting imx6 target into two subtargets called 'cortexa7' and 'cortexa9'
> the way to go?
I wanted to do it this way as well.
> I'm also thinking about future as I will probably want to include another one
> device, this time with i.MX7 (Cortex-A7) so maybe it would make more sense to
> rename the 'imx6' target into something more generic, like 'imx' and
> introduce arch-related subtargets ('cortexa7', 'cortexa9' and later, if
> something comes up, cortexa.. for the i.MX8 family)?
>
Yes, imx makes sense (or imx678 :P)
Cheers,
Petr
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
