Rosen Penev skrev:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 2:40 PM Karl Palsson <[email protected]> wrote:
Rosen Penev <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 7:40 AM Jan Kardell
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rosen Penev skrev:
Nothing uses them. Allows to simplify the Makefile.
Actually I use it for stuff that is not in openwrt repos. That means I
must keep pcrecpp out-of-tree. Maybe others do too, but have not yet
discovered this change. Is really a few saved lines in a makefile worth
to make life more difficult for people who uses openwrt as a base for
there own projects? Or is openwrt not meant to be used that way?
So I kindly request that this change is reverted.
News to me. From the small research I did on Arch and Debian,
all packages use the C API.
I would presume they were refering to their own packages not in
the openwrt repos, not "random package frrom arch/debian"
Exactly so.
I guess others like me usually builds there stuff on a stable openwrt
version, and will not discover the removal until they update the codebase.
Given how much support _is_ given to downstream openwrt builds,
it doesn't seem unreasonable that for a general package like this
we should offer all of it?
GMail put this in spam for some reason.
I have no problem with reverting the commit. The uClibc++ stuff should
be removed though.
I'm fine with the removal of uClibc++.
//Jan
Sincerely,
Karl Palsson
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
