> On 27 Mar 2021, at 00:41, Eneas U de Queiroz <cotequei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 7:35 PM Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
> <l...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> ... I was also frustrated that there was patch fuzz in the tree on a fairly 
>> core package - that really shouldn’t be the case.
> 
> My apologies.  I work in a clone of the openssl git repo, rebasing the
> changes on top of the current version.  I always look at the diffs
> before sending the patch to openwrt.  If they were just line changes,
> I wouldn't bother to touch the patch, in order to minimize changes.
> I'll revise my approach and change the files no matter what.

Thanks for that and I understand your workflow.  I’ve a similar thing when I 
play with dnsmasq updates :-)

As a pedantic note, please check your quiltrc settings as per 
https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-developer/build-system/use-patches-with-buildsystem
 ‘cos the ‘refresh,update’ output you attached still contains index info which 
is usually stripped.

Thanks for all your work on openssl - I don’t understand it but know it’s 
important :-)

Kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to