... I know you won't like this. But in the end, I guess D-Bus, glib2 and in the
end all of MM dependencies will have to be incorporated in the core.
A stac, of big big software, I know. But supporting 4G/5G in the end will
required that.
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:51:51
From: Bjørn Mork <[email protected]>
To: Etienne Champetier <[email protected]>
Cc: Rosen Penev <[email protected]>,
OpenWrt Development List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Brokenness of the OpenWrt "packages" repo
Etienne Champetier <[email protected]> writes:
Are you trying at the same time to complain about not run-tested
updates and possibly having packages not up to date ?
No. The package was fine before the version was changed. In fact, it
was in much better shape before it was changed to a development version
by the very same non-maintainer.
If you don't care enough to even install the package, then please don't
touch the package.
I would personally mark it as broken or remove it instead of making it
work again, but it means removing some other packages.
I'd be all for that, if you apply that rule to all the unmaintained
packages in the repo. It's a much better solution than having the repo
full of arbitrary untested changes to unmaintained packages.
Wrt dbus I'm pretty sure it would provoke an adoption. There are
multiple packages depending on it, and as the immediate reports tell
you: This particualr umaintained package is in active use.
Bjørn
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
