Hi, Alberto, On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 at 01:07, Alberto Bursi <bobafetthotm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Do you think adding the Watchguard M200 would be mostly a copy-paste > job? from what I have seen online it should be more or less the same > board but with a lower end CPU. > I might get one in the near future to do this myself if it's the case.
The M200 poses an additional problem, as Musl assumes ppc64 systems support AltiVec. The M200 SoC doesn't and requires either for Musl to be fixed, or for us to carry patches in order to do so. The former would be the preferred solution, of course. Cheers, Rui _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
