> > [snipped] > > > +CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y > > +CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=y > > +CONFIG_F2FS_FS=y > > +CONFIG_FANOTIFY=y > > +CONFIG_FAT_FS=y > > Do all of these filesystems have to be built-in? We have config > options for them.
I don't think so. I took the kernel 5.4 config as a template, because I didn't want to break things for others when upgrading to 5.10. But I agree, there is no reason for a default buil-in. > > [snipped] > > > +CONFIG_HZ=250 > > Why 250 Hz? Does the 100 Hz all other targets use cause any > measurable > increase in latency? > [snipped] I did not notice this changed. The config I made for 5.10 was before your commit 3326b5e75c277b4fac21bffd2085df4aa40d2775 which changed the default frequency to 100 Hz. There should be no issue with 100 Hz on octecontx, but I will confirm this with new builds on my test devices. > > > +CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_ALWAYS=y > > CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_ALWAYS=y might not be a performance win, > especially with only 1 GiB of RAM. Should be measured, otherwise > MADVISE should be selected instead. Same here, it was selected in the 5.4 kernel config and I have only run tested with this option so far. Let me do some benchmarking with MADVISE before we continue here ... > > Best regards, > Rui > -- Regards Daniel Danzberger embeDD GmbH, Alter Postplatz 2, CH-6370 Stans _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel