Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Rui Salvaterra > Sent: Samstag, 25. September 2021 20:32 > To: Adrian Schmutzler <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> > Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; ros...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath79/ag71xx: rearrange ag71xx structs to remove > holes > > Hi, Adrian, > > On Fri, 24 Sept 2021 at 22:28, Adrian Schmutzler <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> > wrote: > > > > Commit title prefix should be "ath79: ag71xx:" or just "ath79:". > > To be honest, it makes more sense to me to have " > > ath79/ag71xx:", as it conveys the same information requiring one character > less (and this format has often been used before). However, "ath79:" works > for me too. Shall I respin?
Well, rule is that prefix has to be the target. I don't see why we should deviate from this rule now just to save a character. Best Adrian > > > > Apart from that, I can contribute nothing useful :-( > > Thanks, > Rui > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
