> I think that netifd really wanted to add a dependency to the first > route, not the second one. > Maybe netifd should ignore those routes with types for host > dependencies, but I don't know the consequences of that change.
Or maybe it is ok to monitor those kinds of routes if their type is preserved and it netifd consider metrics when it selects the best route. _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
