Given that they both cover similar ground, I think this is a good idea.
I am a user of both, on various platforms/OSes, although on owrt, I use dnsmasq almost exclusively for its broader functionality which also covers DHCP.
On 2023-07-27 00:26, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I'm the maintainer of ISC-DHCP which will be sunsetting soon. I'd like to take the UCI wrappers that I wrote to handle quite a few configuration options and port those to Kea since this makes the most sense as a migration path for people wishing to retain their configurations. That said, it strikes me that this is a broader "under-the-covers" implementation issue that we should shield users from. Would it make sense to try to coordinate with the dnsmasq folks on implementing as much common functionality as possible? Thanks.
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
