On 2024-01-08 16:03, Paul Spooren wrote:
Hi Paul,
PKG_MAINTAINER:=Joe Bloggs <j...@example.com>
PKG_MAINTAINER_HANDLE:=github: @joe; https://forum.openwrt.org/u/joe/
Plan B
co-opt existing PKG_MAINTAINER field, but perhaps it's possible?
e.g:
PKG_MAINTAINER:=Joe Bloggs <j...@example.com>, github: @Joe
I think for that you could use a Codeowners file.
Best,
Paul
In this case, what takes priority?
If both Codeowners and Makefile PKG_MAINTAINER exist, which is
preferred? Do we only expect handles in Codeowners and PKG_MAINTAINER
email in Makefile?
Codeowners lives side-by-side with Makefile or repo root?
I dislike information spread across several different places: it further
behoves the hunt to track down relevant information.
Today to make a PR, I already have to spend five minutes chasing this
info down if I want things to stand a chance of going smoothly,
initially. This is friction for newcomers and for low-hanging-fruit fixes.
If all of the information is in one place, it's easy (easier).
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
