tee-hee. For the record, I would prefer less (and less buggy) offloads than offloads, and to work on scaling software better to multi-cores.
I also would love to find a chip where fq_codel could be offloaded, but with open source for the offload, since the nss drivers are slightly broken... I also would like a pony. On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:40 AM Chuanhong Guo <gch981...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:23 AM Fernando Frediani <fhfredi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi, interesting. Is it enough to give it the necessary performance boost > > when doing NAT ? Is it capable of doing it on the chip or does it do on > > the CPU ? Reading about it seems to be a software thing although seems > > there are hardware capable devices as well. How comparable is this to a > > chip that has NAT offload capability ? > > MT7981 is such a chip with NAT offload capability, and the > flow-offload driver mentioned in other threads is actually > a driver for this hardware block. > Since it's a cost-down MT7986 I would imagine this particular > feature is the same between them: > > HW NAT > − Etherent/WiFi > − Wired speed > − IPv4 routing, NAT, NAPT > − IPv6 routing, DS-Lite, 6RD > > -- > Regards, > Chuanhong Guo > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel -- 40 years of net history, a couple songs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9RGX6QFm5E Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel