pon., 24 cze 2024 o 19:45 Janusz Dziedzic <[email protected]> napisał(a): > > pon., 24 cze 2024 o 14:38 Felix Fietkau <[email protected]> napisał(a): > > > > On 24.06.24 13:46, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > > > pt., 21 cze 2024 o 12:59 Felix Fietkau <[email protected]> napisał(a): > > >> > > >> On 21.06.24 10:55, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > > >> > Hello, > > >> > I see we have backports older than kernel on main (6.6.15 vs 6.6.32)? > > >> > Is there plan to kick backports to smth like 6.10? > > >> > > >> I have 6.9.1 in my staging tree for testing. > > >> > > > > > > Nice, are also patches (reworked) available? > > > > My modified backports tree is here: > > https://github.com/nbd168/backports > > > Thanks, this is what I needed. > Hope will be soon in main :) > Any chance for 6.10.x in main? Or we will use 6.9.1?
Asking because of BE200, 6.9.1 don't support FW90 (with MLO support) - while 6.10 support it correctly (FW90 and MLO/MLD). So, any chance for that soon? BTW, do we have somewhere openwrt backports copy-list or git/data we are used during backport generation? And regarding backports - did someone patch it to use python3? After some fight generate correctly my backports - but is there some wiki description how we should do it correctly for openwrt? Would be useful :) BR Janusz _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
