#20650: ip support options in Busysbox can interfere with ip and ip-full package
choice
--------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: doddel | Owner: developers
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: Chaos Calmer 15.05
Component: base system | Version: Trunk
Resolution: fixed | Keywords: menuconfig
--------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment (by anonymous):
I saw them changed it to 1023, why? Why not 32767? Those two numbers arent
related though, or are they? I mean the rule id and the number in the
rt_tables, right? Also is there a way of ip rule add using an auto-
increment for the priority like it used to have in older version?
It was changed in one of the last builds that it always uses prio 0 if you
dont specifically give the command a priority... that's really bad. The
old design was that it automatically gave a new add the "starting point of
max 32765 = last used - 1"... why was this changed?
For example some time ago it was working like this:
ip rule add ... => prio 32765
ip rule add ... => prio 32764
ip rule add ... => prio 32763
and now it always will give those a prio of 0. Is this a bug too or
intended? If intended... is there an option to use auto-reduce from max
prio with every add like it used to be?
--
Ticket URL: <https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/20650#comment:16>
OpenWrt <http://openwrt.org>
Opensource Wireless Router Technology
_______________________________________________
openwrt-tickets mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-tickets
