On 12-12-09 11:57 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Judging from the other thread about network.sh it seems that you > suppress all default routes in your interfaces,
Yes, I don't want netifd to populate default routes. I want to leave that to other software that pays closer attention to what's happening on those interfaces. > this is also the > reason why henet is never brought up. Ahhh. > It requests a route dependency on 0.0.0.0/0 which is never satisfied > since you run your ifaces with "option defaultroute 0". Is there something that the software that does install the default route(s) should do to play more nicely with route dependency? > You can > comment out the (proto_add_host_dependency ...) call in 6in4.sh if you > can guarantee connectivity at boot time. I certainly like the idea of the dependency and would just have shorewall (which is controlling the default routing) play more nicely with default routes if that's possible. Cheers, b.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users
