> Indeed : ). Haven't think that way before. Sooner or later IPv4 will go > away for sure. But I think most (if not all) packages aren't ready for this > at present, are they? Well... Some you won't need or are relevant to IPv4-only-operation.
Last time I checked, dnsmasq was forwarding queries sent to it over IPv6 (but I don't know if it can cope with sending to upstream recursor over ipv6-only), and the routers' ssh and web interfaces worked over IPv6. Experience with destkop type distributions seems to generally show good IPv6 support, too, in my experience. Generally, client OSes can not all out-of-the-box cope with fully true-IPv6-only network hehe... Not that this matters too much, its' quite OK to talk to local forwarder/recursor over non-global IPv4 etc. I guess, from an OpenWRT point of view, it would be good to make sure (a) such IPv4-dependencies are identified, and (b) that OpenWRT is easy to configure in the various transitionary ISP configurations (DS-Lite, NAT444, 4over6 tunneling, 6rd, etc...). In particular: does it cope 'out of the box' with DHCPv6 subnet auto-allocation from ISP, automatically announcing this to the LAN, and also, prefix delegation to downstream router over DHCPv6 if the ISP provides more than /64 (e.g. /62 on 6rd or /56 or /60 or so native ISP provision). This is important for 'plug in and go' IPv6.... --Simon _______________________________________________ openwrt-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users
