On 14/08/13 20:05, Daniel Lipuma wrote: > Hello dear community, > > Could you help me? > > What am i doing wrong? I have this configuration > > 192.168.3.1 - 192.168.3.2 > +--------+ +--------+ > | router1 |--------------- | router2 | > +--------+ +--------+ > 192.168.1.1 192.168.2.1 > | | > | | > +----+ +----+ > | PC | | PC | > | 1 | | 2 | > +----+ +----+ > 192.168.1.2 192.168.2.2 > > PC 1 become a entry > route add -net 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.1.1 > PC 2 become a entry, too. > route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.2.1
Hi, router1 needs to know 192.168.2.0/24 is via 192.168.3.2 router2 needs to know 192.168.1.0/24 is via 192.168.3.1 if the routers 1 and 2 are default gateways you do not need to put a route on the PCs, but the routers must have them. > > But when i make ping, i dont have response from PC1 to PC2 and vice versa. > > I just have ping from 192.168.3.1 from PC1 and 192.168.3.2 from PC2. > you cannot ping in current configuration because router2 does not know how to get to the 192.168.0.1/24 network, so the reply never reaches you. Put routes on the routers and I think you'll be ok. Regards Jon _______________________________________________ openwrt-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users
