On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 09:31:17PM -0400, Weedy wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Karl O. Pinc <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 12:32:50 -0400 > > Weedy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> For me qos-scripts used to be amazing. but ever since the fq_codel > >> changes it just doesn't work the same. > >> I mean how can a single http stream kill the network? > > > > I always begin by blaming buffer-bloat. But that's just me > > looking for something to blame. > > option upload 500 > option download 10000 > Literally HALF of my line sync.
Hello Weedy, Maybe you need some extra configuration for your line. Like, for a DSL connection I add the linklayer adsl option and set an overhead value like this: Upload: tc qdisc add stab overhead 40 linklayer adsl dev pppoe-wan root handle 1: hfsc default 40 Download: tc qdisc add stab overhead 40 linklayer adsl dev ifb0 root handle 1: hfsc default 40 The overhead depends on the technology in use. There's some documentation on this on the Internet. Without this I also had to go way below my line speed to get halfway decent latencies. I don't know if you can get qos-scripts to set this for you. I use my own script to configure the qdiscs. Regards, Sebastian > > PING 4.2.2.1 (4.2.2.1) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=40.9 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=40.4 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=43.0 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=38.9 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=42.4 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=59 time=39.8 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=59 time=41.9 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=59 time=42.0 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=59 time=44.5 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=59 time=44.0 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=59 time=43.5 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=59 time=46.7 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=59 time=43.6 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=59 time=43.0 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=59 time=43.4 ms > wget > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=59 time=78.9 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=59 time=84.9 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=59 time=89.3 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=20 ttl=59 time=94.8 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=21 ttl=59 time=100 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=22 ttl=59 time=127 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=23 ttl=59 time=143 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=24 ttl=59 time=140 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=25 ttl=59 time=104 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=26 ttl=59 time=112 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=28 ttl=59 time=128 ms > 64 bytes from 4.2.2.1: icmp_seq=29 ttl=59 time=182 ms > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users _______________________________________________ openwrt-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users
