Hi Julia,

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:12:43PM +0400, Julia Dubenskaya wrote:
> There are two reasons why I chose use of /lib/javascript.mhtml.
> 
> 1. 
> I aimed to remove onloading of enumCSP function from the autohandler. 
> Being onloaded for every page this function does a lot of useless job in IE. 
> So I moved its call to the /lib/javascript.mhtml. Now direct using of 
> /lib/javascript.mhtml will load both javascript/vbscript stuff and enumCSP 
> function.
OK, that sounds pretty useful.

> As only several pages really need javascript/vbscript I decided that this 
> solution would be OK. And I did not change the code a lot :). So if you 
> completely disagree it would be easy to add some other changes 
> without rollback.
No, it's fine, I did not think about the onload-part, that sounds
reasonable.

Best regards,
    Alex
-- 
Dipl.-Math. Alexander Klink | IT-Security Engineer
        [EMAIL PROTECTED] | working @ urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.11417

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
OpenXPKI-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openxpki-devel

Reply via email to