Hi Petr,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 02:56:41PM +0300, Petr Grigoriev wrote:
> You has already told me (Tuesday, October 30, 2007 12:25 PM)
> that actions defined in several xml files do not interfere each other.
> It looks like they do (actually all xml files are included in workflow.xml
> one by one aren't they?).
Hmmm, I always assume they only interfered with the same name within the
same workflow definition. I see your point now.
> In such a case we should not remove new states.
True. In the end, we should patch Workflow.pm though, so that action names
are local to a given workflow and state. We will have to look into
that clash for the rest of the workflow definitions, too. I find that
behaviour very counter-intuitive. I'll look into how much work it is
to fix it in Workflow soon, but I fear this kind of stuff is rather
at the core of Workflow.pm :-/
Best regards,
Alex
--
Dipl.-Math. Alexander Klink | IT-Security Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | working @ urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.11417
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
OpenXPKI-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openxpki-devel
