Hi,

On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 06:27:14PM +0100, Alexander Klink wrote:
> I'll probably add randomization to notbefore/notafter later on (if one
> subtracts a (small, in the order of 1 day maybe) number from
> the notbefore date and adds a small number to the notafter date, that
> should be feasible and not disturb anyone) ...

I've been convinced off-list that this is not necessary if we already
have randomized serial numbers. This also has the complication that we
no longer know when a certificate was issued, as we don't have a
database field for this information. So I will not implement it for now,
if someone has a good reason for it, I'll reconsider it.

Cheers,
  Alex
-- 
Dipl.-Math. Alexander Klink | IT-Security Engineer |    [email protected]
 mobile: +49 (0)178 2121703 |          Cynops GmbH | http://www.cynops.de
----------------------------+----------------------+---------------------
      HRB 7833, Amtsgericht | USt-Id: DE 213094986 |     Geschäftsführer:
     Bad Homburg v. d. Höhe |                      |      Martin Bartosch

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
OpenXPKI-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openxpki-devel

Reply via email to