Am 06.04.2012 19:19, schrieb Michael Bell:
> 
> Am 06.04.2012 18:02, schrieb Martin Bartosch:
>>
>>> is it correct that the problem is only WORKFLOW_CONTEXT_KEY?
>>
>> no, it's WORKFLOW_CONTEXT_VALUE we need to index. There already is an index 
>> on the key.
> 
> Okay.

Next question: do we use WORKFLOW_CONTEXT_VALUE or ATTRIBUTE_VALUE only
in joins of select? So can we ignore the update function?

Kind regards, Michael
-- 
___________________________________________________________________

Michael Bell                        Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin

Tel.: +49 (0)30-2093 70143          ZE Computer- und Medienservice
Fax:  +49 (0)30-2093 70135          Unter den Linden 6
[email protected]       D-10099 Berlin
___________________________________________________________________

PGP Fingerprint: 09E4 3D29 4156 2774 0F2C  C643 D8BD 1918 2030 5AAB

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
OpenXPKI-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openxpki-devel

Reply via email to