Please send us a specific description of the steps to reproduce the 2 problems mentioned and we can take a look. There have been a number of recent changes in how addressing is handled on the Google Talk service, and it's possible that some of these changes had side effects.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Evgeniy Khramtsov <[email protected]>wrote: > Justin Uberti wrote: > >> Justin Uberti wrote: >>> >>> >>>> The existing Google Talk client doesn't support MUC, so it provides the >>>> link to the web client as a workaround. >>>> >>>> >>> But if [email protected] uses some client that supports MUC he still >>> receives message with link instead of proper invitation stanza. >>> >>> >> >> >> That's a bug. It shouldn't do that. >> >> > > And what about the transports issue? Any comments from you are very > appreciated! :) > > -- > Regards, > Evgeniy Khramtsov, ProcessOne. > xmpp:[email protected] <xmpp%[email protected]>. > >
