On Thursday 23 April 2009 11:39:10 pm Nickola Kolev wrote: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:03:40 -0500 > > "Luke-Jr" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thursday 23 April 2009 06:04:52 pm Will Tatam wrote: > > > Out of interest I see almost everyone seems to be running ejabberd > > > these days, this because they have had issues with jabberd14 or > > > jabberd2 or just gone for ejabberd due to it's scaling options, > > > should that be required ? > > > > My own personal experience is that all the jabberds are horribly > > unreliable. I use ejabberd because it has problems the least. > > But good luck fixing it if it *does* break. :/ > > Yeah, {for} example {{if}} something in {{the} config file breaks}};, > go and {[find]} it through all the brackets, semicolons and commas out > there. }:]
Usually I don't change anything when stuff breaks. :/ Luke
