On 12/10/09 11:17 AM, Kevin Smith wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: >> That said, there is a minor security concern here. MUC rooms and PubSub >> nodes could garbage-collect owners and admins/publishers, just as core >> XMPP services do. This is another reason to put such entities in the >> user's roster. > > That's the solution I come up with when I think about this. Pair it > with roster annotations (real annotations, rather than the iq:private > based ones) saying 'not contact list users' or something and there's > no reason for this to not be common practice, I think. It also solves > the 'argh, what pubsub services am I subscribed to?' problem if we > start putting them in the roster.
Right. Is this an argument for a new roster protocol? Not that the operators list is the place to work on that... :) /psa
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
