I can provide free space for blog+email or even SMS to notify admins, it only takes a minute to sign up in http://mayplaces.com. You may use subdomain or use your own domain with wp domain mapping. Just let me know is there anything else I can help to contribute the community.
For example: http://xmpp.mayplaces.com With email: [email protected] SMS sender come from "MayPlaces" ps: Cpanel access is also available Regards, Aryo S. Sent from my BlackBerry® powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] Sender: [email protected] Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:00:01 To: <[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] Subject: Operators Digest, Vol 39, Issue 6 Send Operators mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/operators or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Operators digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Progress on public service list (Kevin Smith) 2. Re: Progress on public service list (bear) 3. Re: Progress on public service list (Matthew Wild) 4. Re: Progress on public service list (bear) 5. Re: Progress on public service list (Ben Zimmer) 6. Re: Let's start some witch-hunt (Tomasz Sterna) 7. Re: Rosters flood (Tomasz Sterna) 8. Re: Rosters flood (Tomasz Sterna) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:06:27 +0100 From: Kevin Smith <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Operators] Progress on public service list To: XMPP Operators Group <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Ben Zimmer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > just wanted to report some progress :) > > I managed to reduce the number of completely unprocessed list applicants to 0. > Only thing to do would be making contact to the domain owners by mail > and to the jabber-server-admins by xmpp. > > For the mail-thing, would it be possible to get this done through an > official xmpp.org-mail-address? I think that should improve the return > rate and speed a lot. > I think the same would apply for the xmpp-contacting. > > Let me know if this would be possible, or if I should use my own > address(es) for this. We don't really do xmpp.org email addresses, so using your own seems to be the easier option to me. I don't know what others think. /K ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 12:47:19 -0400 From: bear <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Operators] Progress on public service list To: XMPP Operators Group <[email protected]>, [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" We can do a blog post letting folks know you will be contacting them. Thanks for working on this! On Jun 19, 2011 8:06 AM, "Kevin Smith" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Ben Zimmer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi everybody, >> >> just wanted to report some progress :) >> >> I managed to reduce the number of completely unprocessed list applicants to 0. >> Only thing to do would be making contact to the domain owners by mail >> and to the jabber-server-admins by xmpp. >> >> For the mail-thing, would it be possible to get this done through an >> official xmpp.org-mail-address? I think that should improve the return >> rate and speed a lot. >> I think the same would apply for the xmpp-contacting. >> >> Let me know if this would be possible, or if I should use my own >> address(es) for this. > > We don't really do xmpp.org email addresses, so using your own seems > to be the easier option to me. I don't know what others think. > > /K -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/operators/attachments/20110619/8ccf5a1a/attachment.html> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:18:36 +0100 From: Matthew Wild <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Operators] Progress on public service list To: XMPP Operators Group <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 19 June 2011 17:47, bear <[email protected]> wrote: > > We can do a blog post letting folks know you will be contacting them. Anyone who submitted a request should already be on this mailing list, no? Regards, Matthew ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:27:26 -0400 From: bear <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Operators] Progress on public service list To: XMPP Operators Group <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Jun 19, 2011 1:19 PM, "Matthew Wild" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 19 June 2011 17:47, bear <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > We can do a blog post letting folks know you will be contacting them. > > Anyone who submitted a request should already be on this mailing list, no? That would be a good thing to confirm, but yes I would think so. > > Regards, > Matthew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/operators/attachments/20110619/dd47812f/attachment-0001.htm> ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:16:57 +0200 From: Ben Zimmer <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Operators] Progress on public service list To: XMPP Operators Group <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, the blog post idea sounds like a good one. I think not every requester is on the mailing list, some requests are over a year old and maybe that waiting period generated some drop-outs :) regards, ben On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 22:27, bear <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 19, 2011 1:19 PM, "Matthew Wild" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 19 June 2011 17:47, bear <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > We can do a blog post letting folks know you will be contacting them. >> >> Anyone who submitted a request should already be on this mailing list, no? > > That would be a good thing to confirm, but yes I would think so. > >> >> Regards, >> Matthew > ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:17:13 +0200 From: Tomasz Sterna <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Operators] Let's start some witch-hunt To: XMPP Operators Group <[email protected]> Message-ID: <1308565033.1692.14.camel@smoku-H67M-D2-B3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dnia 2010-06-21, pon o godzinie 14:49 +1200, Daniel Lawson pisze: > I'm not 100% familiar with US phone numbers, but I'm pretty sure > (based on some messages I've intercepted) that the first two numbers > are phone numbers. > > One of the messages we have observed (undelivered messages in > ejabberd's spool table) had this as the content: > > "if you wanna chat call me on xxx-xxx xxxx" (where that number > matches the first number in the body) I bet it's one of these "free SMS" applications for Android. (Using Smack suggests Android) "Use this app, and you won't have to pay for SMS" ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:41:13 +0200 From: Tomasz Sterna <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Operators] Rosters flood To: XMPP Operators Group <[email protected]> Message-ID: <1308566474.1692.16.camel@smoku-H67M-D2-B3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dnia 2010-09-08, ?ro o godzinie 10:22 -0500, Jesse Thompson pisze: > Has anyone ever suggested the idea of clients and/or servers > implementing features to not deliver, or segregate, messages from > users > that aren't subscribed to each others presences? > > Maybe this is already implemented to some extent? Google Talk implements exactly this. This has a separate issue, that I cannot respond to various queries without revealing my presence to an unknown person. I.e. I cannot ask "Who are you and why do you need my presence information?" to a Google Talk user, because GTalk server drops my message. ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:47:27 +0200 From: Tomasz Sterna <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Operators] Rosters flood To: XMPP Operators Group <[email protected]> Message-ID: <1308566847.1692.20.camel@smoku-H67M-D2-B3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dnia 2010-09-08, ?ro o godzinie 10:22 -0500, Jesse Thompson pisze: > 1. first identify/stop unrestricted servers > 2. then identify/stop bad servers > 3. then identify/stop bad users on good servers > 4. then identify/stop compromised users on good servers +1 We have abuse reporting XEPs. Let's ban misbehaving users. If a server admin is unable to handle misbehaving users, let's ban the server. On the contrary to SMTP, not every IP can be an XMPP server, so IP blacklists are effective. ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Operators mailing list [email protected] http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/operators End of Operators Digest, Vol 39, Issue 6 ****************************************
