2013-01-07 (Mon) 15:16 UTC +0100  Daniel Pocock <[email protected]>:

> However, im: implies text chat only.  Are there equivalent prefixes to 
> suggest voice and/or video sessions, and is there any generic prefix to 
> suggest any arbitrary possibility (including smtp) at the caller's discretion?

Hi Daniel

Are you aware of acct: URI scheme¹ ?
Maybe that can be utilized.

[1] draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri

-- 
Mikko

Reply via email to