2013-01-07 (Mon) 15:16 UTC +0100 Daniel Pocock <[email protected]>:
> However, im: implies text chat only. Are there equivalent prefixes to > suggest voice and/or video sessions, and is there any generic prefix to > suggest any arbitrary possibility (including smtp) at the caller's discretion? Hi Daniel Are you aware of acct: URI scheme¹ ? Maybe that can be utilized. [1] draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri -- Mikko
