On 12/19/2014 06:22 PM, Dave Cridland wrote: > A clear message like this, perhaps: > > http://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Plain_Stupid > > (Yeah, everything needs a catchy name these days).
Sounds good; step two is to convince TLS stack maintainers to actually give us access to the client final message so we can do `tls-uniqe' channel binding without resorting to bundling our own TLS stacks (seriously; everything uses tls-unique for channel binding, and it seems like very few stacks actually give you access to the info you need for it). —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 https://blog.samwhited.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
