On Monday 20 July 2015 23:10:21 David Banes wrote: > On 20 Jul 2015, at 23:07, Peter Kieser <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2015-07-10 2:47 AM, Mathias Ertl wrote: > >> * Have a valid 4096 bit certificate with at least a sha256 signature. > > > > 4096 bit seems a bit excessive. NIST is still recommending 2048 bit from > > 2011 to 2030. > > > > -Peter > > I laughed.... I laughed twice!
-- Bandie Kojote Encrypted and signed messages are welcome. GPG: 0x0607E094
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
