Hi,

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:40:48AM +0000, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:
> 
> I think we have set up (but not activated) Flyspray on 
> opm-project.org<http://opm-project.org>. I am reluctant to start using it, 
> since
> I feel that github's issue system so far has been reasonably usable.

We are using flyspray for DUNE, but I have to say that I am not very
fond of it. It does not seem to be actively developed any more and one
always has to use the web interface.

With the issue tracker of github I can just answer by email. The only
thing that is lacking is setting the In-Reply-To header such that my
mail viewer can thread the messages. The biggest drawback of course is
the lack of attaching files to bugs. I know that one can use gists for
this, but that is very uncomfortable.

>  A drawback of using github issues is that they are associated with only a 
> single repo (although it is easy to cross-reference).
> 
> I would not mind having another system in addition, but there are
> questions that should be answered, such as: what issues should go
> where? How do we keep in sync? 

I think one point for tracking issues is preferable. Otherwise people
tend to not know where to post a particulare bug/feature request. (At
least that holds for myself).

Cheers,

Markus


-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858  Fax: +49 (0)322 1108991658

Please notice the new address!

_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm

Reply via email to