Hi, On Wednesday 10 July 2013 17:28:13 Arne Morten Kvarving wrote: > On 07/10/2013 05:22 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 17:01 +0200, Arne Morten Kvarving wrote: > >> what's the current policy with regards to dune? opm master and dune > >> master currently do not play well together. > > > > I'm not sure we even *have* a policy. That said, I'm inclined to > > institute something along the lines of > > > > OPM is compatible with the latest, official Release version of > > the Dune core modules (currently 2.2.1, published on > > 2013-02-27). No effort is made to be compatible with older (or > > newer) versions of the Dune core modules. > > > > That does leave a period of transition between the time of a new Dune > > release (e.g., the 2.3 one that's coming up) and the time we catch up to > > it though. > > > > Still, it makes no sense to chase an in-flux target in my opinion. The > > OPM developer resources are strained as is and I think we should really > > concentrate on improving (and extending) our core domain feature set. I > > also think development that is intended to be compatible with as-yet > > unpublished Dune core modules (i.e., what will become Dune 2.3) should > > happen in a separate branch in each affected OPM module (e.g., something > > along the lines of "dune-next-compatible"). > > while i agree in principle, it becomes a big issue when you are working > on extending opm modules with stuff that > requires new dune functionality. exactly the case i'm in right now. but > i have my answer, i'll keep relying on ugly patchery for now.
hm, I thought that DUNE has the policy that all code for release N will still compile with release N+1 (but with deprecation warnings). Maybe they ditched it in the mean time, though. cheers Andreas -- A programmer had a problem. He thought to himself, "I know, I'll solve it with threads!". has Now problems. two he -- Davidlohr Bueso
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
