Hi, this issue appeared in PR 335 for opm-core, but it is a more "political" problem, so I push it to the mailing list: What version should be used for the master branches? As far as I can see, there are three alternatives:
(1) keep the version number of the previous release for the master branch. That's the current OPM approach (2) after a release, immediately increase the version number of the master branch to the one of the next release (the current Dune approach) (3) after a release, use the version that release for the development branch, but increment the point release level to something unrealistically high for the normal maintenance releases (99, say). This is the approach KDE takes. Since (1) and (2) come with severe compatibility issues which are hard to spot, I'm inclined to (3), but this is approach also has some conceptual impurities (i.e., misuse of the point release level)... Are there any options? Should the current state of affairs be changed after 2013.09? cheers Andreas -- A programmer had a problem. He thought to himself, "I know, I'll solve it with threads!". has Now problems. two he -- Davidlohr Bueso
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
