Thank you for doing this, I had a build failure though (reported as issue), but it can be easily fixed.
Thank you - fix on the way. I agree with your proposed plan, and I think it can be kept separate from opm-core for now. It may be more natural to move deck-reading simulators out of opm-core rather than moving the parser into opm-core, some people think opm-core is too big already. But so far, it is fair to keep the parser and EclipseReservoir in opm-parser and make a branch in opm-core that uses it (eventually). Good - seems we have a plan! How would you like the status of opm-parser to be for the 2013.09 release of OPM? Acknowledged but experimental? Not part of the release? Fully official part of the release? It is not entirely clear to me what "Acknowledged but experimental" implies; but that sounds good! Joakim ------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you
_______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
